Monthly Paper Recommendations

Below is a top30 recommended journal article list for this month from a comprehensive collection of journals that features applied ecology / conservation. I developed an AI agent that aggregates recent publications, enriches entries with metadata (title, journal, abstract), and scores each article against my interests learned from my publications and selected favorite articles to surface the most relevant papers. The list prioritizes high-impact and closely aligned work while still including exploratory items to broaden coverage. Thought it might give some better idea of my research flavor.


Journal accessed: Loading...

Top 10 picks

Conservation auctions with deferred payments directly address budgets/ROI and dynamic timing of investment; leverages land-market mechanisms to prioritize protected area expansion under scarce public funds.
Johanna Kangas; Janne S. Kotiaho; Markku Ollikainen
Ecological Economics
Applies structured decision making to weigh ecological, social, and economic trade-offs for selective fish passage—clear multi-objective prioritization and stakeholder-weighted optimization.
Shane Flinn; Andrew M. Muir; Kelly Robinson
Conservation Science and Practice
Focuses on value of information within iterative SDM; uses CVOI to decide when to monitor vs act and simplifies to decision trees—core to monitoring vs management trade-offs.
Laura M. Keating‐Elske; James R.N. Glasier; Laura D. Burns; Julian R. Dupuis; Llewellyn Haines; Lacey Hébert; Justis Henault; Jennifer Heron; Jessica E. Linton; Zachary G. MacDonald; Felix A.H. Sperling; Robert A. Sissons
Conservation Science and Practice
Systematic conservation planning for protected area growth with explicit land tenure constraints; prioritizes threatened vs potentially threatened species and highlights cost-effective Indigenous PA expansion.
Emmeline Norris, Ben Scheele, Marcel Cardillo
Conservation Biology
Spatial restoration prioritization via linear programming maximizing benefit-to-cost ratios; integrates land-use history, species distributions, and acquisition costs—strong on ROI/cost-effectiveness and land-use change.
Sarah R. Weiskopf; Toni Lyn Morelli; Tina G. Mozelewski; Alexey N. Shiklomanov; Susannah B. Lerman
Ecological Applications
Optimization of co-occurring threats (fire regimes and predator control) to recover threatened species; linear programming under uncertainty—relevant to endangered species management and structured prioritization.
William L. Geary; Ayesha I. T. Tulloch; Tim S. Doherty; Dale G. Nimmo; Euan G. Ritchie; Jeffrey O. Hanson; Marika A. Maxwell; Adrian F. Wayne
Journal of Applied Ecology
Global systematic prioritization linking area targets to species coverage; quantifies trade-offs and efficient selection of optimal protected areas—central to protected area prioritization and target setting.
Qianshuo Zhao; Mark John Costello
Ecography
Addresses dynamic/sequential restoration decisions and timing, comparing active vs. hybrid strategies with dynamic LCA; emphasizes ROI/cost‐effectiveness and trade-offs in climate mitigation and biodiversity co‐benefits—guiding investment under budget constraints.
Marco di Cristofaro; Federico Valerio Moresi; Mauro Maesano; Riccardo Salvati; Dora Cimini; Daniele Cecca; Giulia Bonella; Giuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza
Journal of the Total Environment
Develops a transboundary conservation plan integrating threatened species hotspots, ecosystem services, ecological gradients, and connectivity; quantifies trade-offs (e.g., with carbon/soil/water) and identifies priority areas outside existing protection—highly relevant to protected-area prioritization and systematic planning under land-use pressure.
Zhongde Huang, Qiying Wang, Jie Wang, Zhou Fang, Lin Wang, Maroof Ali, Zhangqian Yang, Haoran Chen, Shi Xue, Qin Zhou, Changgao Cheng, Feiling Yang, Yang Bai
Conservation Biology
Directly targets systematic conservation planning by proposing how to integrate food‐web metrics into spatial prioritization to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services; speaks to trade-offs, resilience, and stronger protected-area design.
Louise M. J. O'Connor; Wilfried Thuiller; Ulrich Brose; Éléonore Chenevois; Carla Freund; Benoit Gauzens; Pierre Gaüzere; Catherine Graham; Michael Harfoot; Myriam R. Hirt; Sébastien Lavergne; Luigi Maiorano; Atte Moilanen; Peter H. Verburg; Piero Visconti; Laura J. Pollock
Conservation Letters

Top 30 picks

Title indicates multi-objective landscape design for conservation, directly relevant to systematic conservation planning, protected area/landscape prioritization, and explicit trade-offs between biodiversity and ecosystem services; likely aligns with portfolio/efficient frontier thinking and cost-effectiveness across objectives.
Alienor L.M. Chauvenet; Anna R. Renwick; Hugh P. Possingham; Vanessa M. Adams; Jennifer McGowan; Vesna Gagić; Nancy A. Schellhorn
Biological Conservation
Presents dynamic optimal control policies for managing an invasive species, matching sequential decision-making over time and structured decision making in conservation; connects to adaptive management/endangered species management contexts via threat control and incorporates a sustainability (risk) metric via entropy.
Shyam Kumar; Preet Mishra; R. K. Brojen Singh
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Zoning that integrates ecosystem service flows directly supports systematic conservation planning and protected-area zoning while addressing trade-offs among ecological risk, human uses, and management objectives.
Ruijing Qiao; Zhenghong Liang; Naixin Yin; Song Zhang; Luming Liu; Wangye Lu; Feiling Yang; Ronghua Zhong; Jie Li
Journal of Environmental Management
Spatial prioritization of restoration–protection using an ecosystem services–climate–human framework aligns with protected area prioritization under land-use/climate change and integrates biodiversity–ecosystem service co-benefits.
Zhengrong Yuan; Hui Zhao; Da Wei; Meihong Wang; Ruoming Li; Xiaodan Wang
Journal of Environmental Management
CCAM provides a structured decision-making framework to adapt long-term monitoring under climate change, clarifying monitoring vs. management roles and enhancing value-of-information for conservation decisions.
Madeleine C. Burns; David J. Lawrence; David Thoma; Koren Nydick; Joel Reynolds; Jena Hickey; Marie Denn; Kirk Sherrill; Jessica Weinberg McClosky
Journal of Environmental Management
Optimizes sequential thinning timing/intensity to balance carbon and timber (dual objectives), exemplifying dynamic decisions, ROI/cost-effectiveness, and trade-offs in forest management under discounting and uncertainty.
Xueying Lin; Guanmou Chen; Lingbo Dong
Journal of Environmental Management
Distributive justice framework for implementing the GBF addresses environmental justice/inequality, budget responsibilities, and global trade-offs in financing and burden-sharing for biodiversity action.
Ina Lehmann, Marcel Kok, Roos Immerzeel, Alexandra Marques
Conservation Biology
Area of Habitat mapping for inland wetland species strengthens data foundations for systematic conservation planning and protected area prioritization, including for underrepresented taxa.
Francesca A. Ridley, Catherine A. Sayer, Louise Mair, Daniele Baisero, Monika Böhm, Thomas M. Brooks, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Viola Clausnitzer, Jeorg Freyhof, Günther Grill, Ian Harrison, Randall R. Jiménez, Bernhard Lehner, Nicholas B. W. Macfarlane, Andrew J. Plumptre, Arnout van Soesbergen, Thomas A. Worthington, Thomas Starnes
Conservation Biology
Presents a monitoring design framework for detecting mass mortality events, quantifying how sampling frequency and detectability affect information yield—key to value-of-information and surveillance optimization.
Jesse L. Brunner, Justin M. Calabrese
Conservation Biology
Operational framework bridging digital decision-support to policy for agri-environment schemes advances structured decision making, implementation under budget constraints, and managing environment–agriculture trade-offs.
A.C. Wartenberg; C. Cheng; C. Marples; H. Dettmann; K. Hemminger; F. Ghafarian; L. Schaan; M. Scoville; S.D. Bellingrath-Kimura
Biological Conservation
Analyzes water sparing vs. sharing to depolarize wetland–agriculture conflicts, directly tackling trade-offs and policy design for biodiversity and ecosystem service conservation in working landscapes.
Matthew W. Herring; Stephen T. Garnett; Kerstin K. Zander
Biological Conservation
Integrates climate and anthropogenic dynamics with management actions across multiple populations to inform prioritization and optimize restoration under constraints—relevant to adaptive management and trade-off evaluation.
Teagan A. Hayes; Aaron N. Johnston; L. Embere Hall; Jill Randall; Matthew Kauffman; Chris Keefe; Kevin L. Monteith; Tabitha A. Graves
Ecological Applications
Time-varying flow–ecology modeling for an endangered fish supports adaptive management under non-stationarity, linking hydrological decisions to species outcomes in a dynamic, data-driven framework.
Parsa Saffarinia; James A. Hobbs; Stephanie M. Carlson; Albert Ruhí
Ecological Applications
Demonstrates scalable passive acoustic monitoring with Bayesian dynamic occupancy to quantify disturbance impacts and trends, informing monitoring design and management responses at regional scales.
Jason M. Winiarski; Sheila A. Whitmore; Connor M. Wood; Jonathan P. Eiseman; Erin C. Netoskie; Matthias E. Bieber; H. Anu Kramer; Kevin G. Kelly; Kate McGinn; Craig Thompson; Sarah C. Sawyer; Stefan Kahl; Holger Klinck; M. Zachariah Peery
Ecological Applications
Highlights the implementation gap in restoration prioritization due to land tenure/governance and emphasizes empowering smallholders—key for realistic systematic planning, equity, and socio-economic feasibility.
Pablo Bravo‐Monasterio; Enzo Martelli‐Moya; Marcela A. Bustamante‐Sánchez; Leland K. Werden
Journal of Applied Ecology
Concept of Keystone Management Species under the ESA shows how endangered species management catalyzes cross-sector, ecosystem-based management—linking single-species mandates to broader conservation outcomes.
Sean A. Hayes; Joe Roman
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Directly addresses protected area effectiveness and advocates dynamic, sequential conservation planning to protect refugia during population declines—aligning with systematic conservation planning, protected area prioritization, and endangered species/adaptive management under uncertainty.
Luis M. Carrascal; Ángel C. Moreno; Juan Carlos Illera
Conservation Science and Practice
Maps bentho-demersal communities to evaluate and guide MPA network coverage and representation—classic systematic conservation planning and protected area prioritization with biodiversity–fishery trade-offs to inform cost-effective spatial allocation.
Miguel López; Morane Clavel‐Henry; Joan B. Company; Nixon Bahamón; Otso Ovaskainen
Conservation Science and Practice
Quantifies large economic losses from wildlife–agriculture conflict and identifies spatial hotspots to target preventive measures—speaks to land-use change, ROI/cost-effectiveness and trade-offs, structured decision-making for coexistence, and environmental justice via disproportionate impacts on smallholders.
Hugo C. M. Costa; Carlos A. Peres; Neander M. Heming; Dionei José da Silva; Manoel dos Santos‐Filho; João Vitor Campos‐Silva; Danielle Storck‐Tonon
Journal of Applied Ecology
Examines ‘stewardship drop’ across stages of an incentive program and suggests payment timing and monitoring design—relevant to dynamic/sequential decisions, monitoring vs management, and cost-effective program design in conservation on private lands.
Michael G. Sorice; Kyle Clifton; Klaus Moeltner; Wylie Carr; Nicole Adimey
Conservation Letters

Exploratory picks

Applies procedural justice from criminal justice to conservation law enforcement in PAs—an unexpected but relevant lens for improving compliance, reducing conflict, and addressing environmental justice alongside deterrence.
Freya A. V. St. John, Leejiah Dorward, Harriet Ibbett, Martina Feilzer
Conservation Biology
Rigorous 20-year impact evaluation of organized guarding for human–elephant conflict reveals unintended increases in elephant mortality—illuminating trade-offs, the need for counterfactual evaluation, and adaptive management design.
Nitin Sekar, Tanay Bhatt, Arpit Deomurari, Sanchaya Sharma, Poonam Kumari, Athisii Kayina, E. Somanathan
Conservation Biology
Optimization-based, multi-species camera-trap design directly tackles monitoring vs. management trade-offs and ROI by improving precision across species with differing space-use—useful for structured decision-making and value-of-information planning.
Gonçalo Curveira‐Santos; Gates Dupont; Chris Sutherland; Charli Pretorius; Simon Naylor; Kerrin Allan; Laura C. Gigliotti
Journal of Applied Ecology
Global scoping review of OECMs under 30x30 highlights gaps in effectiveness evidence, socio-cultural integration, and decision-support—useful for PA prioritization alternatives, planning under budgets, and cross-objective trade-offs.
Dimitra Petza; Eva Amorim; Emna Ben Lamine; Francesco Colloca; Esther Dominguez Crisóstomo; Erika Fabbrizzi; Simonetta Fraschetti; Ibon Galparsoro; Sylvaine Giakoumi; Maren Kruse; Vanessa Stelzenmüller; Stelios Katsanevakis
Ambio
Commodity- and land-use–specific carbon emission factors for Colombia enable targeted, spatially explicit interventions in deforestation-free supply chains—relevant to land-use change, market feedbacks, and maximizing conservation ROI.
Camilo Zamora; Robert Masolele; Katja Berger; Johannes Reiche; Christopher Martius; Louis Verchot; Zoltan Szantoi; Martin Herold
Environmental Research Letters
Natural field experiment on charitable donations and extinctions offers behavioral insights for financing conservation—outside the box yet valuable for budgeting, fundraising strategies, and portfolio-style resource allocation.
Michael K. Tanner
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Tiered framework for interregional ecosystem service flows from migratory species links qualitative to dynamic models—guiding when to invest in better data (VOI) vs. action and enabling multi-region, sequential conservation planning.
D. J. Semmens; K. J. Bagstad; J. J. Derbridge; J. E. Diffendorfer; W. E. Thogmartin; B. J. Mattsson; A. Lien; C. C. Chester; J. A. Dubovsky; L. López‐Hoffman
Conservation Biology
Contact

Lab Location: University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 445 Hesler
Mailing Address: 569 Dabney Hall, 1416 Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996-1610

hyoon15@vols.utk.edu