Title indicates multi-objective landscape design for conservation, directly relevant to systematic conservation planning, protected area/landscape prioritization, and explicit trade-offs between biodiversity and ecosystem services; likely aligns with portfolio/efficient frontier thinking and cost-effectiveness across objectives.
Alienor L.M. Chauvenet; Anna R. Renwick; Hugh P. Possingham; Vanessa M. Adams; Jennifer McGowan; Vesna Gagić; Nancy A. Schellhorn
Biological Conservation
Presents dynamic optimal control policies for managing an invasive species, matching sequential decision-making over time and structured decision making in conservation; connects to adaptive management/endangered species management contexts via threat control and incorporates a sustainability (risk) metric via entropy.
Shyam Kumar; Preet Mishra; R. K. Brojen Singh
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Zoning that integrates ecosystem service flows directly supports systematic conservation planning and protected-area zoning while addressing trade-offs among ecological risk, human uses, and management objectives.
Ruijing Qiao; Zhenghong Liang; Naixin Yin; Song Zhang; Luming Liu; Wangye Lu; Feiling Yang; Ronghua Zhong; Jie Li
Journal of Environmental Management
Spatial prioritization of restoration–protection using an ecosystem services–climate–human framework aligns with protected area prioritization under land-use/climate change and integrates biodiversity–ecosystem service co-benefits.
Zhengrong Yuan; Hui Zhao; Da Wei; Meihong Wang; Ruoming Li; Xiaodan Wang
Journal of Environmental Management
CCAM provides a structured decision-making framework to adapt long-term monitoring under climate change, clarifying monitoring vs. management roles and enhancing value-of-information for conservation decisions.
Madeleine C. Burns; David J. Lawrence; David Thoma; Koren Nydick; Joel Reynolds; Jena Hickey; Marie Denn; Kirk Sherrill; Jessica Weinberg McClosky
Journal of Environmental Management
Optimizes sequential thinning timing/intensity to balance carbon and timber (dual objectives), exemplifying dynamic decisions, ROI/cost-effectiveness, and trade-offs in forest management under discounting and uncertainty.
Xueying Lin; Guanmou Chen; Lingbo Dong
Journal of Environmental Management
Distributive justice framework for implementing the GBF addresses environmental justice/inequality, budget responsibilities, and global trade-offs in financing and burden-sharing for biodiversity action.
Ina Lehmann, Marcel Kok, Roos Immerzeel, Alexandra Marques
Conservation Biology
Area of Habitat mapping for inland wetland species strengthens data foundations for systematic conservation planning and protected area prioritization, including for underrepresented taxa.
Francesca A. Ridley, Catherine A. Sayer, Louise Mair, Daniele Baisero, Monika Böhm, Thomas M. Brooks, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Viola Clausnitzer, Jeorg Freyhof, Günther Grill, Ian Harrison, Randall R. Jiménez, Bernhard Lehner, Nicholas B. W. Macfarlane, Andrew J. Plumptre, Arnout van Soesbergen, Thomas A. Worthington, Thomas Starnes
Conservation Biology
Presents a monitoring design framework for detecting mass mortality events, quantifying how sampling frequency and detectability affect information yield—key to value-of-information and surveillance optimization.
Jesse L. Brunner, Justin M. Calabrese
Conservation Biology
Operational framework bridging digital decision-support to policy for agri-environment schemes advances structured decision making, implementation under budget constraints, and managing environment–agriculture trade-offs.
A.C. Wartenberg; C. Cheng; C. Marples; H. Dettmann; K. Hemminger; F. Ghafarian; L. Schaan; M. Scoville; S.D. Bellingrath-Kimura
Biological Conservation
Analyzes water sparing vs. sharing to depolarize wetland–agriculture conflicts, directly tackling trade-offs and policy design for biodiversity and ecosystem service conservation in working landscapes.
Matthew W. Herring; Stephen T. Garnett; Kerstin K. Zander
Biological Conservation
Integrates climate and anthropogenic dynamics with management actions across multiple populations to inform prioritization and optimize restoration under constraints—relevant to adaptive management and trade-off evaluation.
Teagan A. Hayes; Aaron N. Johnston; L. Embere Hall; Jill Randall; Matthew Kauffman; Chris Keefe; Kevin L. Monteith; Tabitha A. Graves
Ecological Applications
Time-varying flow–ecology modeling for an endangered fish supports adaptive management under non-stationarity, linking hydrological decisions to species outcomes in a dynamic, data-driven framework.
Parsa Saffarinia; James A. Hobbs; Stephanie M. Carlson; Albert Ruhí
Ecological Applications
Demonstrates scalable passive acoustic monitoring with Bayesian dynamic occupancy to quantify disturbance impacts and trends, informing monitoring design and management responses at regional scales.
Jason M. Winiarski; Sheila A. Whitmore; Connor M. Wood; Jonathan P. Eiseman; Erin C. Netoskie; Matthias E. Bieber; H. Anu Kramer; Kevin G. Kelly; Kate McGinn; Craig Thompson; Sarah C. Sawyer; Stefan Kahl; Holger Klinck; M. Zachariah Peery
Ecological Applications
Highlights the implementation gap in restoration prioritization due to land tenure/governance and emphasizes empowering smallholders—key for realistic systematic planning, equity, and socio-economic feasibility.
Pablo Bravo‐Monasterio; Enzo Martelli‐Moya; Marcela A. Bustamante‐Sánchez; Leland K. Werden
Journal of Applied Ecology
Concept of Keystone Management Species under the ESA shows how endangered species management catalyzes cross-sector, ecosystem-based management—linking single-species mandates to broader conservation outcomes.
Sean A. Hayes; Joe Roman
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Directly addresses protected area effectiveness and advocates dynamic, sequential conservation planning to protect refugia during population declines—aligning with systematic conservation planning, protected area prioritization, and endangered species/adaptive management under uncertainty.
Luis M. Carrascal; Ángel C. Moreno; Juan Carlos Illera
Conservation Science and Practice
Maps bentho-demersal communities to evaluate and guide MPA network coverage and representation—classic systematic conservation planning and protected area prioritization with biodiversity–fishery trade-offs to inform cost-effective spatial allocation.
Miguel López; Morane Clavel‐Henry; Joan B. Company; Nixon Bahamón; Otso Ovaskainen
Conservation Science and Practice
Quantifies large economic losses from wildlife–agriculture conflict and identifies spatial hotspots to target preventive measures—speaks to land-use change, ROI/cost-effectiveness and trade-offs, structured decision-making for coexistence, and environmental justice via disproportionate impacts on smallholders.
Hugo C. M. Costa; Carlos A. Peres; Neander M. Heming; Dionei José da Silva; Manoel dos Santos‐Filho; João Vitor Campos‐Silva; Danielle Storck‐Tonon
Journal of Applied Ecology
Examines ‘stewardship drop’ across stages of an incentive program and suggests payment timing and monitoring design—relevant to dynamic/sequential decisions, monitoring vs management, and cost-effective program design in conservation on private lands.
Michael G. Sorice; Kyle Clifton; Klaus Moeltner; Wylie Carr; Nicole Adimey
Conservation Letters